1. Alexander MP. Feinberg TE, Farah MJ. Behavioral Neurology and Neuropsychology. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1997. Aphasia: clinical and anatomic aspects; pp. 133–149.
2. Ardila A. Ardila A. Aphasia Handbook. 2014. Major aphasic syndromes: Wernicke's aphasia and Broca's aphasia; pp. 60–75. E-book. Pdf.
3. Goodlass H, Kaplan E, Barresi B. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. 3 ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2001.
4. Caplan D, Waters G, Howard D. Slave systems in verbal short-term memory. Aphasiology. 2012;26(3-4) doi: 10.1080/02687038.2011.642795.[PMC free article][PubMed][Cross Ref]
5. Faroqi-Shah Y, Thompson CK. Approaches to treatment of agrammatism. In: Bastiaanse R, Thompson CK, editors. Perspectives on agrammatism. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012. pp. 158–191.
6. Wisenburn B, Donahue C, Sobrinski M. A meta-analysis of therapy efficacy for agrammatism due to aphasia. Presentation at American Speech-Language Hearing. Philadelphia, PA: Association Annual Convention; 2010.
7. Helm-Estabrooks N, Nicholas M. Sentence Production Program for Aphasia. 2ª ed. Pro-Ed.; 2000.
8. Goodglass H, Gleason JB, Bernholtz ND, Hyde MK. Some linguistic structures in the speech of a Broca's aphasic. Cortex. 1972;8:191–212.[PubMed]
9. Thompson CK, Bastiaanse R. Introduction to agrammatism. In: Bastiaanse R, Thompson CK, editors. Perspectives on agrammatism. Hove: Psychology Press; 2012. pp. 1–16.
10. Coelho CA, Sinotte MP, Duffy JR. Schuell's stimulatin approach to rehabilitation. In: Chapey R, editor. Language Intervention Strategies in Aphasia and Related Neurogenic Communication Disorders. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer/ Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008. pp. 403–449.
11. Bonifazi S, Tomaiuolo F, Altoè G, Ceravolo MG, Provinciali L, Marangolo P. Action observation as a useful approach for enhancing recovery of verb production: new evidence from aphasia. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2013;49:473–481.[PubMed]
12. Doyle PG, Goldstein H, Bourgeois MS. Experimental analysis of syntax training in Broca's aphasia: a generalization and social validation study. J Speech Hear Dis. 1987;52:143–155.[PubMed]
13. Fink R, Schwartz M, Rochon E, Myers J, Socolog G, Bluestone R. Syntax stimulation revisited: an analysis of generalization of treatment effects. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 1995;4:99–104.
14. Cherney LR, Patterson JP, Raymer A, Frymark T, Schooling T. Evidence- based systematic review: effects of intensity of treatment and constraint-induced language therapy for individuals with stroke-induced aphasia. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:1282–1299.[PubMed]
15. Allen L, Mehta S, McClure JA, Teasell R. Therapeutic interventions for aphasia iniciated more than six months post stroke: a review of the evidence. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2012;19:523–535.[PubMed]
16. Kelly H, Brady MC, Enderby P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5):CD000425.[PubMed]
17. Teichmann M, Dupoux E, Kouider S, et al. The role of the striatum in rule application: the model of Huntington's disease at early stage. Brain. 2005;128:1155–1167.[PubMed]
18. Teichmann M, Dupoux E, Cesaro P, Bachoud-Lévi AC. The role of the striatum in sentence processing: evidence from a priming study in early stages of Huntington's disease. Neuropsychologia. 2008;46:174–185.[PubMed]
19. Thompson CK, den Ouden DB, Bonakdarpour B, Garibaldi K, Parrish TB. Neural plasticity and treatment-induced recovery of sentence processing in agrammatism. Neuropspychologia. 2010;48:3211–3227.[PMC free article][PubMed]
20. Thompson CK, Riley EA, den Ouden DB, Meltzer-Asscher A, Lukic S. Training verb argument structure production in agrammatic aphasia: Behavioral and neural recovery patterns. Cortex. 2013;49:2358–2376.[PMC free article][PubMed]
21. Cicerone KD, Langenbahn DM, Braden C, et al. Evidence-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation: Updated Review of the Literature From 2003 Through 2008. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:519–530.[PubMed]
The purpose of this paper is to examine the linguistic problems of aphasic speakers of Finnish. The focus is on Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. First, we present an overview of the special characteristics of the grammar of Finnish. Secondly, there is a discussion of previous studies on aphasic speakers of Finnish. Thirdly, we present an analysis of our data from conversation and picture description task by speakers with Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. The analysis focuses on case marking, subject-verb agreement, word order and the expression of tense in the speech of Finnish aphasics. As a whole, many linguistic features are preserved both in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasia. Even the neologistic words in Wernicke's aphasia are appropriately inflected. However, our findings suggest that aphasic errors are not always systematic and furthermore, they may be context-dependent. For example, Broca's aphasics produced case marking and agreement patterns in some contexts correctly, whereas in some other contexts they were produced erroneously. The word order patterns were similar to those found in conversational discourse in general. However, it is sometimes impossible to give a definitive analysis of the word order or structure of a given grammatical construction. This is due to the fact that sentence structure is sometimes badly distorted both in Broca's and Wernicke's aphasic cases because of difficulty in finding lexical content words. We conclude with a comparison of our findings with previous studies of Finnish aphasics, proposing some methodological implications for further studies.